Executive functioning predicts academic achievement in middle school: A four year longitudinal study by William Ellery Samuels, Nelly Tournaki, Sheldon Blackman and Christopher Zilinski
Material type: TextSeries: ; vol. 109 n5Description: pp. 478-490Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0022-0671
- The Journal of Educational Research
- Per/370.1/S193/2016
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Periodical Indexing | DSSC LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER | Per/370.1/S193/2016 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Browsing DSSC LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Executive functioning (EF) is a strong predictor of children's and adolescents' academic performance. Although research indicates that EF can increase during childhood and adolescence, few studies have tracked the effect of EF on academic performance throughout the middle school grades. EF was measured at the end of Grade 6-9 through 231 teachers' and 22 teacher assistants' assessment of 322 adolescents from disadvantaged backgrounds who attended an urban, chartered middle/high school. Assessment of EF was done through the completion of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). BRIEF global executive composite scores (GEC) predicted both current and future English/language arts, mathematics, science, social studies, and Spanish annual grade point average (GPAs). The effect of BRIEF GEC scores often overshadowed the effects of gender, poverty, and having an individual education plan; the other, non-BRIEF-related effects retained slightly more impact among teacher assistant-derived data than teacher-derived data. The strong relationships between BRIEF GEC scores and these GPAs also remained constant over these 4 years; There was little evidence that EF changed over the measured grades or that the relationship between EF and grades itself regularly changed. The findings indicate that EF scores during early middle grades can well predict academic performance in subsequent secondary-school grades. Although methodological constraints may have impeded the abilities of other factors (i.e., poverty) to be significantly related to GPAs. the effects of EF were strong and robust enough to prompt us to recommend its use to guide long-term, academic interventions.
There are no comments on this title.